Valdivia

People v. Valdivia

Good Law
180 Cal. App. 3d 657·226 Cal. Rptr. 144
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 1986G001973California3,311 words

Opinion

Opinion

CROSBY, Acting P.J.

Is a Miranda warning necessarily defective for failure to specifically include an advisement of a right to an attorney during, as well as before, questioning? [1] To this and several related issues, we conclude not.

The bullet-punctured corpse of a male adult was found on the sidewalk in front of the Siete Leguas Bar in Santa Ana in the early morning hours of October 1, 1983. A white Chevrolet was parked nearby. The barmaid told investigating officers the driver of the vehicle had a gun and argued with the victim that evening. She was able to give them a physical description of the man, but not his name. The victim's roommate identified the car's owner as Jose Valdivia, however, and said he worked in the same pizza restaurant as the victim.

A Department of Motor Vehicles check confirmed the vehicle was registered to a Jose Valdivia, and the manager of the restaurant where he was employed gave officers a photograph of him. They also obtained several possible addresses from different sources. None proved fruitful until they were invited into the home of Juan Roman, who officers believed was Valdivia's brother. Just as they were explaining to Roman why…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.