In Re Marriage of Foster

Good Law
180 Cal. App. 3d 1068·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1574·227 Cal. Rptr. 446
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 1986D001918California1,911 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kremer, J.

When Johnnie and Betty Foster’s marriage was dissolved in 1978, the trial court awarded Betty a 43 percent community interest in Johnnie’s military retirement benefits. Johnnie refused to pay Betty from his retainer pay and eventually voluntarily resigned from the Navy, thereby forfeiting his retirement benefits. In a later action challenging the original judgment’s enforcement, the trial court awarded Betty arrears and made Johnnie a constructive trustee for the amount Betty would have monthly received from the pension had Johnnie not resigned. We find the award of arrears proper. However, because Johnnie resigned, his pension never matured. Under the original judgment, Betty would have had no claim to immature benefits. Therefore, the trial court erred in making Johnnie a trustee of the same. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Factual and Procedural Background

Johnnie enlisted in the United States Navy in October 1952 and married Betty approximately six months later. Johnnie actively served in the Navy until October 1976 when he transferred to the Fleet Reserve. At that time, he began receiving monthly retainer pay under 10 United States Code section 6330 .

In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.