Posey

Posey v. State of California

Good Law
180 Cal. App. 3d 836·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1554·225 Cal. Rptr. 830
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 8, 1986A024640California6,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

Merrill, J.

Under the facts of this case we decide that the failure of California Highway Patrol (CHP) officers to stop and inspect or to stop and remove a vehicle parked alongside the traveled roadway does not create a basis for liability on the part of the CHP, and thereby the State of California (State), in that there is neither a mandatory duty nor a special relationship which obligates these officers to do the aforesaid acts.

Mary Ann Posey (Posey), appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered upon the trial court’s sustaining of a demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend.

Pursuant to the court’s order sustaining the demurrer and allowing the State to recover all allowable costs, the State filed a memorandum of costs and disbursements. Thereafter, Posey filed a motion to tax costs which was granted. State appeals from the trial court’s order granting Posey’s motion to tax costs.

I

As we are reviewing a judgment entered pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer, we accept the material facts as set forth in the complaint as true. (Schneider v. Union Oil Co. (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 987, 990 [ 86 Cal.Rptr. 315 ].)

On December 7, 1979, at approximately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.