United States v. Sergio Piedra-Castro

Good Law
421 F. App'x 698
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 201110-10346California203 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Sergio Alfonso Piedra-Castro appeals from the 85-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Piedra-Castro contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court failed to reduce his sentence to account for: (1) the youthfulness and remoteness of his prior enhancing conviction, and (2) the alleged ongoing punishment and deterrent effects from the injury he sustained when apprehended by United States Border Patrol agents.

The record reflects that the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (9th Cir.2010).

To the extent Piedra-Castro contends that the district court failed to consider or make required factual findings regarding his injuries and the circumstances surrounding those injuries, these contentions are not supported by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.