In Re Ruby T.

Good Law
181 Cal. App. 3d 1201·227 Cal. Rptr. 8
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 1986H000526California1,022 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gretchen O. Burford, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Objector and Appellant.

Ralph R. Kuchler, County Counsel, and Diane C. Popowski, Deputy County Counsel, for Petitioner and Respondent.

OPINION

BRAUER, J.

Marie P. appeals from a permanency planning order which directed the Monterey County Department of Social Services to file a "free from custody" action under section 232, subdivision (a)(7) of the Civil Code, [1] in regard to her three minor children. She raises various claims regarding the insufficiency of the showing to support the order. But as Marie P. subsequently relinquished custody of her children voluntarily, we find her appeal to be moot and therefore dismiss it.

On March 12, 1982, Marie P.'s three children, Paula, Ruby, and Monica, ages eight and six years, and seven months, respectively, were taken into protective custody by the Salinas Police Department after Marie P.'s boyfriend was observed on a Salinas street corner hitting the eldest child with a belt. Marie P. was present at the time and made no effort to protect her daughter from the attack. Marie P. was arrested and it was discovered that she and the children had been living in a hotel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.