Lopez

People v. Lopez

Good Law
181 Cal. App. 3d 842·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1656·226 Cal. Rptr. 714
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 1986G002037California1,365 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crosby, J.

Must evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant be suppressed where the affiant officer essentially bases his opinion as to the reliability of the informant on a “track record” supplied by other officers? No.

I

In this narcotics prosecution, Huntington Beach Officer Carl Vidano presented an affidavit in support of a search warrant to a magistrate on November 19, 1983, seeking to search an individual and residence for cocaine. In the affidavit Vidano described himself as a sergeant who has worked in narcotics enforcement for a total of 10 years and has “participated in hundreds of arrests of persons for violations of controlled substance laws and . . . testified as an expert in this field ... on over 75 occasions.”

Vidano stated he was contacted by a confidential reliable informant the same day who told him a male Colombian living in Yorba Linda was a “major dealer in cocaine.” The suspect was identified as Julian Jaramillo, also known as Danny Lopez. Jaramillo and his girlfriend Lucy recently moved to Yorba Linda from Long Beach; and within the past six days the informant had observed a large clear plastic bag of the freezer variety containing high quality Colombian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.