In Re Marriage of Slater

Caution
100 Cal. App. 3d 241·160 Cal. Rptr. 686·1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 2420
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1979Civ. 44162California2,919 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

On this appeal by the wife from an interlocutory judgment of dissolution, the contentions are that the court erred by; 1) setting a value of zero on the goodwill of the husband’s group medical practice pursuant to the withdrawal provision of the partnership agreement; 2) equalizing the community property by awarding her a five-year promissory note of $24,430; and 3) awarding her spousal support of only $750 a month. We have concluded that the judgment must be reversed for a redetermination of the value of the husband’s interest in the group medical practice.

The record reveals the following pertinent facts: The parties were married in February 1958 and separated in December 1975, after 17 years, 10 months and 7 days. The wife was awarded custody of their three children, born respectively in 1960, 1962 and 1966, and husband ordered to pay child support of $250 a month per child until emancipation, majority or further order of the court. The husband, a gynecologist, had been practicing in a partnership (Hayward Medical Group) since 1954. The wife was unemployed and had no professional skills or work experience; she was attending college at the time of the judgment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.