Smith v. Alameda County Social Services Agency

Good Law
153 Cal. Rptr. 712·1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 1539·90 Cal. App. 3d 929
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 23, 1979Civ. 42753California4,209 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brunn, J.

In this case we undertake the delicate and difficult task of deciding whether or not to fashion a new cause of action. Appellant, in an able brief, states the underlying question: “The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether a county social services agency which has been entrusted with the sole responsibility for finding an infant an adoptive home may be held liable [for damages] if that agency negligently fails to carry out its responsibilities.”

Our discussion will be in three parts. We will first summarize the factual and procedural setting. Next, we will examine the main question. Finally, we will direct our attention to several additional issues raised by appellant.

I

Dennis Smith (hereafter Dennis) appeals from a judgment of dismissal. The judgment was entered after the court below sustained demurrers to his complaint without leave to amend and also granted motions to strike the complaint.

The complaint names many defendants. They fall into two groups. One is the Alameda County Social Services Agency, related other public agencies and named employees of and consultants to them. For the sake of simplicity we will refer to this group as the agency. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.