Colvin Mccright v. Arnold Schwarzenegger
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 201008-16994California231 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 20 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
COLVIN MCCRIGHT, No. 08-16994
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:08-CV-00804-JW
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Ware, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 5, 2010 **
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Colvin McCright, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1915A. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,
Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000), and we affirm.