Colvin Mccright v. Arnold Schwarzenegger

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 201008-16994California231 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COLVIN MCCRIGHT, No. 08-16994

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:08-CV-00804-JW

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Ware, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010 **

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Colvin McCright, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1915A. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,

Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.