People v. Daugherty

Bad Law
123 Cal. App. 3d 314·176 Cal. Rptr. 500·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2115
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 1981Crim. 22176California2,194 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elkington, J.

By her instant appeal defendant Lesa Daugherty seeks “specific enforcement” of a plea bargain claimed to have been breached by the Santa Clara County District Attorney.

Santa Clara County has separate municipal court facilities in Palo Alto and San Jose. Defendant was charged by complaint with, and was awaiting preliminary examination in the Palo Alto facility on, a charge of grand theft. Upon her arraignment on that charge a plea bargain was announced by her attorney, a deputy public defender, and the deputy district attorney attending that facility of the municipal court. It was memorialized as follows:

The parties disagree as to the interpretation of the foregoing proceedings. The Attorney General argues that the People were thereby permitted to repudiate the plea bargain at will, leaving defendant with only the option of withdrawing her guilty plea. She, on the other hand, insists that the prosecutor was bound in good faith to seek dismissal of all similar charges of grand theft occurring in the county prior to April 3, 1980, the day of the plea bargain.

We consider the plea bargain.

Although not artfully stated, a close reading and analysis of it reveals the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.