Camp

Walter Camp v. Board of Supervisors

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 3d 334·176 Cal. Rptr. 620·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2117
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 1981Docket Nos. 45922, 48356, 48357California10,485 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rattigan, J.

The Planning and Zoning Law (Gov. Code, tit. 7, div. 1, commencing with § 65000) required in 1978 (as it does now) that the board of supervisors of each county adopt a general plan for the “physical development” of the county, pursuant to section 65300; that the plan be prepared and adopted according to standards established in sections 65300.5 and 65301; and that it include each of nine “elements” enumerated and described in section 65302. As the result of several enactments adopted over a course of years, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Mendocino (hereinafter Board and County) had by 1978 compiled a so-called “Mendocino County General Plan” pursuant to the mandate of section 65300. In each of three separate superior court actions commenced in that year, the contention was made that the plan was invalid because some of its elements did not meet the requirements of section 65302.

The first action filed (No. 39640) was heard and decided by a judge who rejected the contention, determined that the plan complied with section 65302, and entered a judgment which held in effect that the plan was valid and denied the relief sought in this action. The other two actions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.