Lachman

Lachman v. Cabrillo Pacific University

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 3d 941·177 Cal. Rptr. 21·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2175
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 1981Civ. 22652California1,451 words

Opinion

Opinion

Staniforth, J.

The multiple (16) plaintiffs’ (Privett) complaint alleged breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentations made by the Cabrillo Pacific University (Cabrillo) by its agents to Privett and others as an inducement to enroll in the San Diego College of Business. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to Privett’s pleadings for the announced reason of failure to exhaust administrative remedies before filing this lawsuit. The trial court dismissed the action and this appeal followed.

Discussion

For the purposes of these proceedings we assume to be true the facts properly pleaded in plaintiffs’ complaint and amendments thereto. Privett and others sued Cabrillo, seeking injunctive relief and damages. The complaint alleged breach of contract, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, negligent misrepresentation, negligent hiring and a violation of Education Code section 94318, formerly section 29035, and sought rescission and restitution based on fraud, failure of consideration and mutual mistake of fact. The trial court sustained the demurrers and dismissed the proceeding based upon its interpretation of Education Code section 94332. The trial court held the sections provided an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.