In Re Larry P.

Good Law
201 Cal. App. 3d 888·247 Cal. Rptr. 472
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 1988B021885California2,749 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anthony R. Garcia, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Objector and Appellant.

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and Ronald J. Selgrath, Deputy County Counsel, for Petitioner and Respondent.

OPINION

KLEIN, P.J.

Objector and appellant Tamila or Tamalia P. (the mother) appeals from orders of the juvenile court.

The orders are affirmed, and because of the efforts made to locate the mother, it is unnecessary to address the constitutionality of notice by mail to the last known address when it is known such address is no longer valid.

On June 17, 1985, the Los Angeles County Department of Children's Services (DCS) filed a petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) and (d), [2] to have Larry P. and Mary P., five-year-old twins, and Panapa P., age four, adjudged dependent children of the court. The petition alleged: the minors had no parent capable of exercising proper control; the minors and their home were filthy; the mother had failed to register Larry and Mary in school; Mary had no shoes; the minors' father's whereabouts and interest/ability to parent were unknown; and the home was an unfit place by reason of the neglect of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.