Moore

People v. Moore

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 505·201 Cal. App. 3d 877·247 Cal. Rptr. 353
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 1988B025361California3,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danielson, J.

Michael Darryl Moore (defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury trial at which he was found guilty of robbery (Pen. Code, §211) as charged in a one count information. The jury also found to be true the allegations that defendant was armed with a firearm during the commission of that offense (§ 12022, subd. (a)) and had taken funds and property of a value exceeding $100,000 (§§ 12022.6, subd. (b), and 1203.045, subd. (a)). Prior to trial defendant’s motion to suppress (§ 1538.5) a written note as evidence was granted. After defendant’s direct testimony, during his cross-examination, at trial, the court granted the People’s motion to admit the suppressed evidence for the purpose of impeachment.

Factual Statement

A part of our decision is based on our holding that in the light of all of the evidence it does not appear reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the defendant would have been reached in the absence of error. Therefore we summarize the evidence in substantial detail.

On October 24, 1984, over $335,000 worth of jewelry was taken during a robbery of Gordon’s Jewelry Store in the Pasadena Mall. Defendant, who had been employed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.