Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Superior Court

Bad Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 494·201 Cal. App. 3d 924·247 Cal. Rptr. 477
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 11, 1988D007910California253 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

The opinion filed May 11, 1988, is ordered published.

Real party, Thomas Downs, filed suit against petitioner, PrudentialBache Securities, Inc. (Bache). Bache brought a motion to compel arbitration which was denied. On July 14, 1987, Bache filed a timely notice of appeal.

In December 1987, real party was ordered to court for failure to file an at issue memorandum. After a hearing real party was ordered to file an at issue memorandum and the case has been set for trial on June 22, 1988.

Code of Civil Procedure section 916 provides that “the perfecting of an appeal stays proceedings in the trial court. . . upon the matters embraced therein or affected thereby . . . .” Here Bache appealed the order denying arbitration. That appeal affects the entire case. Thus, further trial court proceedings are stayed under Code of Civil Procedure section 916. The fact that this is a “fast track” case does not annul or make inoperative previous statutes and case law.

An alternative writ or order to show cause would add nothing to the presentation. A peremptory writ is proper. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1088; United Nuclear Corp. v. Superior Court (1980) 113 Cal.App.3d 359 [ 169 Cal.Rptr. 827…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.