Estate of Baumann

Good Law
201 Cal. App. 3d 927·247 Cal. Rptr. 532
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 1988G004203California4,052 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bacon & Hamilton, Robert L. Bacon and Michael R. Gradisher for Objectors and Appellants.

OPINION

SONENSHINE, Acting P.J.

The son and grandsons of decedent Leola Baumann challenge a court order determining, upon principles of collateral estoppel, that certain property purportedly owned by Leola at her death was joint tenancy property and thus not subject to testamentary disposition. We conclude the court erred, as a matter of law, in failing to find the joint tenancy had been effectively severed during the decedent's lifetime and, accordingly, reverse.

In July 1980, Leola purchased a condominium in Fullerton. After making a down payment of $20,000 towards the $81,500 purchase price, she took title in joint tenancy with her son, John, and his wife, Nancy. This was done to enable Leola to qualify for the loan and because of John's and Nancy's desire Leola's estate not be subject to probate on her death. John estimated he ultimately contributed about 10 percent towards the purchase price of the property and its maintenance.

Early in 1982, John encountered financial difficulties with his communications business. His corporation defaulted on certain debts he had personally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.