Vrgora

Vrgora v. Los Angeles Unified School District

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 3d 1178·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1745·200 Cal. Rptr. 130
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 1984Civ. 68443California3,413 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

Sevkija Vrgora appeals from a superior court judgment determining that he was liable for certain liquidated damages, pursuant to a contract he entered into with the Los Angeles Unified School District (hereafter LAUSD or respondent) for the construction of an automotive service facility. He contends that the entire amount of damages or a portion thereof was improperly assessed as a matter of law because: (1) LAUSD failed to disclose a condition material to the work he was to perform prior to their entering into the agreement; (2) any damages resulting due to delay were not apportionable to him because he was not entirely responsible for the delay; and (3) LAUSD used the completed portion of the facility prior to acceptance of the project as a whole.

Finding, for the most part, that these arguments are predicated upon conflicting evidence, we must affirm the judgment.

Facts

Appellant Vrgora, a general contractor, was the successful bidder for the construction of an “automotive service shed” at the West Valley Occupational Center in Woodland Hills, operated by LAUSD. In January 1977, Vrgora and LAUSD memorialized their agreement in writing. The agreement specified, inter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.