Corralejo

Corralejo v. Quiroga

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 3d 871·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1715·199 Cal. Rptr. 733
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 1984B001211California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Defendants’ counsel appeals from an order requiring him to pay $100 to plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5.

Factual and Procedural Summary

Plaintiffs and cross-defendants Julian and Bertha Corralejo (plaintiffs) filed a complaint against the defendants and cross-complainants Consuelo and Gabriel Zapata and German Quiroga (defendants). The complaint was filed in the Municipal Court of Los Angeles on July 23, 1981.

The defendants filed a cross-complaint seeking damages in excess of the jurisdictional limitation of the municipal court. On November 24, 1981, the matter was ordered transferred to the Los Angeles Superior Court upon payment of transfer fees by the defendants.

On February 25, 1983, the plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss the cross-complaint for failure of the defendants to pay the requisite transfer fees. One day prior to the time the motion was calendared to be heard, the defendants paid the fee.

The plaintiffs’ counsel did not receive any notice of the defendants’ payment of fees. Plaintiffs subsequently sought imposition of sanctions against the defendants under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5. Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.