Van Velzer v. Superior Court

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 3d 742·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1702·199 Cal. Rptr. 695
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 1984Civ. 31577California695 words

Opinion

Opinion

Butler, J.

Jerry Lee Van Velzer pleaded guilty to child molesting (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)) and witness tampering (§ 137, subd. (a)) on No vember 18, 1982. On December 16, 1982, the court sentenced him to prison for 13 years, 8 months'. Van Velzer appealed his sentence and, in an unpublished opinion, Vve remanded the case to the superior court for resentencing. ' :

When Van Velzer appeared for resentencing on December 19, 1983, he successfully asked the court for a continuance to have a new probation report prepared and a psychological evaluation conducted. At that time, Van Velzer’s attorney submitted a supplemental statement in mitigation, asking the court to consider'‘matters relative to Van Velzer’s care and treatment in prison since the dató of the original, now vacated, sentence.

The People objected to the court considering this new information, arguing the court could not consider any matters after the original December 16, 1982, sentencing. They based their argument on California Rules of Court rule 435(b)(1), analogizing Van Velzer’s resentencing to imposition of sentence following probation revocation. The court agreed and sealed the documents. Van Velzer now seeks a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.