Charles Morris v. Michael Budge
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 201110-15688California174 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 16 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES DEJUAN MORRIS, No. 10-15688
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:06-cv-00493-ECR-
RAM
v.
MICHAEL BUDGE; ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM *
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
NEVADA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Edward C. Reed, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 14, 2011 ** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner-Appellant Charles Dejuan Morris, a Nevada state prisoner,
appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm for the reasons
stated in the district court’s…