Charles Morris v. Michael Budge

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 201110-15688California174 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 16 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES DEJUAN MORRIS, No. 10-15688

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:06-cv-00493-ECR-

RAM

v.

MICHAEL BUDGE; ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM *

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

NEVADA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Edward C. Reed, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 14, 2011 ** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner-Appellant Charles Dejuan Morris, a Nevada state prisoner,

appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm for the reasons

stated in the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.