Trejo

People v. Trejo

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 81·217 Cal. App. 3d 1026·266 Cal. Rptr. 266
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 1990F011373California2,678 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

The question of first impression presented by this appeal is whether a defendant charged with a felony can waive a 12-person jury and stipulate to trial by 6 jurors. We conclude a criminal defendant can consent to a trial by six jurors pursuant to the constitutional provision which permits waiver of a jury trial.

Statement of the Case

Appellant Eladio Chavez Trejo was charged with one count of offering to sell heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352) in an amount greater than 14.25 grams (Pen. Code, § 1203.07, subd. (a)(2)). Appellant requested trial by a six-person, rather than a twelve-person, jury. After determining that appellant’s waiver was knowing and voluntary, the court granted his request.

At sentencing, defense counsel explained his tactical reasons for opting for the smaller jury: “With a six man jury in a case where the prosecution had such strong evidenced[ ] I was in a position to guarantee that I could at least substitute all six jurors; whereas if it was a twelve man jury I only had ten challenges; if I wanted to knock them all off I couldn’t unless I could find cause. So I was in a position that I was able to select a jury that I felt would be best suited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.