United States v. Ricardo Cordero-Ontiveros
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 16 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50622
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-03510-LAB-1 Southern District of California, v. San Diego
RICARDO CORDERO-ONTIVEROS,
ORDER
Defendant - Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and HOLLAND, Senior District Judge.*
The memorandum disposition filed December 21, 2010, is hereby amended
as follows: At page 3, lines 4-5, replace “It was logical and reasonable for the
district court to use Cordero’s past sentences as a starting point for setting his new
sentence” with “It was logical and reasonable for the district court to set Cordero’s
sentence higher than his past sentences”.
With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. No further
petitions for rehearing will be entertained.
* The Honorable H. Russel Holland, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Alaska, Anchorage, sitting by designation.