Hockersmith

People v. Hockersmith

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 183·217 Cal. App. 3d 968·266 Cal. Rptr. 380
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 1990G006852California3,048 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scoville, J.

Defendant Mary Hockersmith was charged with possession of cocaine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350.) It was further alleged she had suffered a prior conviction for sale of a narcotic within the meaning of Health and Safety Code section 11370, subdivision (a). Following a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of possession of cocaine. The trial court denied probation and sentenced defendant to the low term of 16 months in prison. In sentencing defendant, the trial court specifically stated it was denying probation only under the compulsion of Health and Safety Code section 11370, subdivision (a), and the only basis for such action was a finding the alleged prior conviction was true.

Defendant contends the alleged prior conviction was neither admitted nor proved at trial. We have reviewed the record and it appears defendant did not admit the charged prior. No motion was made to bifurcate trial of the prior from the main charge, nor did defendant waive jury trial with respect to it. In addition, neither the clerk’s nor the reporter’s transcript indicates that a hearing was had or that any evidence was taken with respect to the charged prior.

Respondent concedes the record is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.