Ingalls

United States v. Ingalls

Good Law
73 F. Supp. 76·1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2255
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1947Cr. 10568-SDCalifornia1,277 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weinberger, J.

The defendant Elizabeth Ingalls, having been convicted by a jury, and now moving for a new trial, is charged in Count 1 of an indictment as follows:

The motion for a new trial challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and also asserts that the Court erroneously defined “slave” to the jury.

There is a abundance of evidence which establishes that for many years prior to the date charged in the indictment, defendant Elizabeth Ingalls kept one Dora L. Jones, a negro woman, in her household as a servant during a period in excess of twenty-five years. There is evidence that during an uninterrupted period of in excess of twenty-five years said, servant was required to arise at an early hour in the morning and perform practically all of the household labor in connection with the maintenance of the Ingalls household. She was forbidden to leave the household except for the commission of errands and performed drudgery of the most menial and laborious type, without compensation. She had no days off from her work, no vacation. Her quarters were among the poorest in the several homes occupied by the defendant during this period of years. There is evidence that the food furnished to her by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.