Constancio

Constancio v. State Personnel Board

Good Law
179 Cal. App. 3d 980·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1453·225 Cal. Rptr. 133
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 1986Civ. 24683California3,399 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Plaintiff Frank Constancio appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5). Plaintiff sought to compel defendant California State Personnel Board (hereafter Board) to set aside its decision upholding his dismissal from employment with respondent Department of the Youth Authority (hereafter Department).

Plaintiff contends: (1) the Board’s implied finding he willfully used phencyclidine (PCP) is not supported by substantial evidence; (2) the Board’s decision upholding his termination is not supported by its findings; (3) the Board improperly shifted to plaintiff the burden to prove his PCP use was involuntary; (4) the term “Failure of Good Behavior” as grounds for dismissal is unconstitutionally vague; (5) his witness was intimidated by the presence of Stockton police officers in and around the hearing room; and (6) the Board’s penalty of dismissal constitutes an abuse of discretion. We disagree with each of plaintiff’s contentions and shall affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff was terminated from employment as a group supervisor at the Department’s DeWitt Nelson Training Center in Stockton,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.