Dawkins

People v. Dawkins

Good Law
195 Cal. App. 3d 1·241 Cal. Rptr. 456
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 19873650California1,858 words

Opinion

Opinion

The People appeal from the order of the court below dismissing charges against respondent on the grounds that the district attorney is precluded from litigating the issues raised in this case under the rule of People v. Sims (1982) 32 Cal.3d 468 [ 186 Cal. Rptr. 77 , 651 P.2d 321 ].

The facts as presented at proceedings in the court below are as follows.

Respondent was employed by BART as a station manager at the Glen Park BART station. In the summer of 1984, BART became concerned about a pattern of theft from ticket dispensing machines at the Glen Park station; an investigation by BART police, including surveillance of the machine in question, machine no. 5629, was started on August 11, 1984. The officers put marked one dollar bills into the machine to establish a pattern of theft; the bills were marked with a crayon mark visible only under ultraviolet light. According to the surveillance officers, 24-hour surveillance of the machine commenced November 2, 1984, after earlier investigation had revealed that money shortages in the machine were occurring primarily on the weekends, when respondent worked.

Respondent was arrested and charged with the thefts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.