Shaffer

People v. Shaffer

Good Law
195 Cal. App. 3d 939·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 2248·241 Cal. Rptr. 99
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 1987B022510California772 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fukuto, J.

Timothy Shaffer appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of robbery with the use of a firearm (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 12022.5) and a true finding by the court of a prior prison term enhancement (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). He contends that the enhancement must be reversed because the trial court inadvertently discharged the jury after a verdict was rendered on the underlying offense, and improperly reconvened the jury for trial of the enhancement.

It is unnecessary to set forth a detailed statement of the facts surrounding the robbery. It suffices to say that on August 26, 1985, appellant used a .357 magnum to rob the manager of a Topanga shoe store.

Prior to trial, appellant moved for a bifurcated trial on the issue of several charged prior convictions. The motion was granted. Appellant was tried before a jury and convicted of robbery with the use of a firearm. After the jury was polled, and the verdict recorded, the court made the following statement to the jury: “Then, ladies and gentlemen, that completes your service in connection with this case. . . .

After a brief recess, proceedings resumed out of the presence of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.