Hiemstra

Hiemstra v. TRW, INC.

Good Law
195 Cal. App. 3d 1629·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 2303·241 Cal. Rptr. 564
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1987B024573California2,142 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fukuto, J.

James Hiemstra appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of TRW, Inc. (TRW).

The facts are not disputed.

TRW, a consumer credit reporting agency, offers a computerized service to subscribers who provide to TRW certain credit information concerning consumers, which TRW evaluates and stores. Upon request of a subscriber, TRW disseminates a credit profile which contains private financial information. TRW receives, on an average, 200,000 such requests each day. Crocker Bank has been a contractual subscriber of TRW since 1973. At the time Crocker became a subscriber, it entered into a service agreement with TRW which provides, in pertinent part: “8. Subscriber Use Limitations. Subscriber hereby certifies and agrees that it will request and use credit data received from TRW solely in connection with a credit transaction involving the consumer as to whom a credit profile is sought. . . .

In 1984, Margaret Hiemstra, James’s wife, applied for an extension of credit with Crocker. In connection with the application, she provided husband James’s name, address and social security number. Thereafter, Crock-er requested and received from TRW, credit reports on both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.