Anderson

People v. Anderson

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 633·221 Cal. App. 3d 331·270 Cal. Rptr. 516
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1990B028490California4,137 words

Opinion

Opinion

George, J.

Following a jury trial, defendants Gregory Anderson, Diane Navarro, Richard Navarro, and Richard Valles were convicted of shooting at an inhabited dwelling (Pen. Code, § 246), burglary of the residence of Anna Argostino (§ 459), robbery of Argostino committed within a residence (former § 213.5), forcible sexual penetration by a foreign object upon Argostino (§ 289, subd. (a)), two counts of assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury upon Theodore Nelson and Eric Rivera, respectively (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), and conspiracy to commit robbery (§ 182, subd. (a)(1)). The jury found true the following additional allegations: all defendants except Richard Navarro used firearms in the commission of the burglary of the residence of Argostino and the robbery of Argostino (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)), a principal in those offenses was armed with a firearm (§ 12022, subd. (a)), and Valles used a firearm in the commission of the assaults with force likely to produce great bodily injury upon Nelson and Rivera (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)).

Prior to sentencing, Richard Navarro admitted he had suffered a previous conviction of a serious felony. (§ 667, subd. (a).) Diane Navarro having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.