Emerald

Crocker National Bank v. Emerald

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 659·221 Cal. App. 3d 852·270 Cal. Rptr. 699·11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1321
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 1990C004716California4,309 words

Opinion

Opinion

DeCRISTOFORO, J.

Defendant, Robert M. Emerald, proceeding in propria persona, appeals from a judgment granting plaintiff Crocker National Bank’s motion for summary judgment. Crocker’s motion for summary judgment stems from a collection action brought by Crocker against Emerald for nonpayment on a promissory note. Emerald appeals from the judgment of dismissal following the order granting summary judgment, contending triable issues of fact exist as to whether Crocker has complied with California Uniform Commercial Code section 9504 subdivision (3) which requires the sale of collateral to be conducted in a commercially reasonable manner. Emerald also argues Crocker is estopped from collecting the deficiency judgment by the doctrine of unclean hands, and contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying him leave to file a cross-complaint. Finally, Emerald requests this court to make findings of fact under Code of Civil Procedure section 909. We shall reverse the order granting summary judgment, decline to make findings of fact, and affirm the trial court’s denial of leave to file a cross-complaint.

Factual and Procedural Background

This dispute between Crocker and Emerald has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.