Reeder

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reeder

Bad Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 672·221 Cal. App. 3d 961·270 Cal. Rptr. 719·1990 WL 88544
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 1990D008755California6,597 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

The purchasers of condominium units, their homeowners association, an individual developer and the entities which participated in the construction and sale of the condominium project appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of a liability insurer. We reverse because we find the exclusions the insurance company relies upon do not apply as a matter of law to the claims made against the insureds.

Factual and Procedural Summary

Although the record in this case is voluminous, it does not definitively describe the relationship between the various entities who developed the condominium project. Generally the parties agree defendant Samuel Pearl-man purchased three adjoining parcels of vacant land in Carlsbad in 1972. At the time Pearlman bought the parcels they had been graded. Thereafter Pearlman formed defendant Roundtree, Ltd., a partnership. The partnership in turn formed a joint venture with defendant Twelve Trees Corporation (Twelve Trees). The joint venture was named Roundtree Condominiums, also a defendant. Defendant DMF Construction, Inc. (DMF), was retained as a general contractor to construct condominiums on the three parcels. At various stages between 1980…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.