Valnes

Valnes v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 702·221 Cal. App. 3d 1116·270 Cal. Rptr. 636
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 1990B042284California2,141 words

Opinion

Opinion

Spencer, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Robert D. Valnes (hereafter petitioner) appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085).

Statement of Facts

Petitioner owns a condominium in the City of Santa Monica which he rents to real party in interest Anni Luciani. The condominium was converted from an apartment after Santa Monica’s rent control laws took effect and without a removal permit, making it subject to the rent control laws and precluding eviction of the tenant in residence at the time of conversion (Santa Monica City Charter, art. XVIII, § 1806(h)(6)).

Desiring to “go out of the business of renting residential housing,” as permitted by the Ellis Act (Gov. Code, §§ 7060-7060.7), petitioner attempted to file with defendant Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Board) a “Notice of Intent to Withdraw Residential Rental Units.” The Board requires such notice to be filed with it before a landlord may go out of the residential rental business pursuant to the terms of the Ellis Act. (Santa Monica Rent Control Board Regs., ch. 16, § 16002.) The Board refused to accept petitioner’s notice for filing on the ground the Ellis Act does not apply to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.