Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 650·221 Cal. App. 3d 692·270 Cal. Rptr. 650
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 1990F011485California15,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

In this appeal we are called upon to determine the sufficiency of an environmental impact report (EIR) for a proposed 26.4-megawatt coal-fired cogeneration plant to be constructed in the City of Hanford (City). We are also asked to determine (1) the sufficiency of the evidence contained in the EIR to support the determination of the Hanford City Council that the proposed project would have no significant impact upon the environment and (2) whether the city council had authority to approve the project in light of the “Hanford General Plan” (General Plan), which appellants claim is defective.

Appellants are three associations: Kings County Farm Bureau, Kings County Citizens for a Healthy Environment, and Citizens for a Healthy Environment. They challenge the EIR on several grounds, which we generally categorize as (1) the adequacy of the discussion of the impact of this project on the local environment with regard to air quality, water use and waste disposal, (2) the adequacy of the discussion of the cumulative impacts of this project and similar projects with regard to air quality, water use and waste disposal, (3) the adequacy of the discussion of alternatives to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.