Multani

MEMORANDUM

Satnam Singh Multani, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Multani also seeks review of the IJ’s finding that he filed a frivolous application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence findings of fact, including adverse credibility determinations. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001). We review a determination that an applicant knowingly made a frivolous applica tion for asylum for compliance with a procedural framework outlined by the BIA. See Ahir v. Mukasey, 527 F.3d 912, 917 (9th Cir.2008). We review de novo due process claims. See Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

Boota Singh Basi prepared Multani’s asylum application. The IJ found Multani’s application to be false, based on Basi’s testimony that he made up Multani’s claim, and the government’s submission of a second application, nearly…