Vaughn

Vaughn v. DeKreek

Good Law
1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 1455·2 Cal. App. 3d 671·83 Cal. Rptr. 144
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1969Civ. 11925California3,151 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bray, J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment after jury verdict in favor of defendants in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

Questions Presented

1. Is the jury’s finding that plaintiff, who was unlicensed, was acting as a contractor supported by the evidence?

2. Is the action moot because of satisfaction of the judgment?

Record

Plaintiff is a retail nurseryman, doing business at Woodland under the name of Vaunlanda Gardens Nursery, having been such since 1932. He has a retail sales tax license but does not have a contractor’s license.

Defendants are homeowners who wanted their residence surrounded with plants, shrubs and a lawn. Defendants, who had secured a bid from another nursery, requested plaintiff to look at their yard and suggest plant materials. Plaintiff and defendants discussed ideas and plaintiff tendered and defendants accepted an estimate for a total cost of approximately $750. During the progress of the work suggested changes were made. The most significant was the planting of a complete, ready-to-enjoy lawn of dichondra. When the work was completed, plaintiff tendered a bill for $2,114, based on an hourly rate for labor and a charge for materials plus sales…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.