Gary Hallford v. Hillary Clinton

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 201110-17547California226 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 17 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GARY WILLIAM HALLFORD, No. 10-17547

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:10-cv-04488-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM *

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2011 **

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Gary Williams Hallford appeals pro se from the

district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of his action seeking a Writ of

Prohibition against the Secretary of State to prevent her from enforcing an age

requirement in hiring employees for the United Nations. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.