Williams v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Good Law
1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 1478·2 Cal. App. 3d 949·83 Cal. Rptr. 76
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 1969Civ. 33380California1,882 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The preliminary facts giving rise to the petition for writ of mandate, the issuance of which is the subject of this appeal are not in dispute.

On or about December 31, 1963, Herbert Williams (hereinafter Williams) was convicted of violating Vehicle Code section 23102, subdivision (a) (driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor) in the Municipal Court of the Pasadena Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, following his plea of guilty at the time of the arraignment. The court recommended no suspension of Williams’ driver’s license. The abstract of Williams’ judgment of conviction states that he was duly arraigned, the complaint was read to him, and he was informed of his constitutional and legal rights. The abstract does not specifically state that Williams was represented by counsel or that he knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel.

On October 2, 1967, in the Municipal Court of the Santa Anita Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, after his plea of guilty, Williams was again convicted of a violation of Vehicle Code section 23102, subdivision (a). At that time he was duly advised of his constitutional and legal.rights,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.