Russell

Russell v. Bankers Life Co.

Good Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 627·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1785·46 Cal. App. 3d 405·40 Cal. Comp. Cases 894
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 24, 1975Civ. 45009California4,949 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of respondent Bankers Life Company in an action denominated by appellant Austin B. Russell in his complaint as one “for declaratory relief and for money.” The main issue revolves around the interpretation of a group disability insurance policy issued by respondent to appellant’s employer, George Chevrolet. Since the underlying facts in this case are not in dispute and the issue is whether the court properly interpreted the contested insurance policy provision, we adopt generally the statement of facts as set forth in respondent’s brief.

Appellant was employed by George Chevrolet as a service writer. While there, he was covered under Chevrolet’s workmen’s compensation insurance policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company. Pursuant to his employment, appellant was also eligible for long-term group disability insurance through respondent. On April 1, 1971, in consideration of payment of specified premiums, respondent issued to appellant a certificate of insurance under the group policy with Chevrolet. The record shows that appellant was never provided with a copy of the disability policy. Even appellant’s attorney was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.