Greenblatt

Greenblatt v. Kaplan's Restaurant

Good Law
171 Cal. App. 3d 991·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2472·217 Cal. Rptr. 746
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 1985G000553California1,327 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trotter, J.

Plaintiff filed a complaint in Orange County Municipal Court for personal injuries arising out of an alleged fall in Kaplan’s Restaurant. The case was transferred to Orange County Superior Court upon plaintiff’s motion.

On April 26, 1983, plaintiff filed a motion to specially set the case for trial, on the ground that due to her advanced age and poor physical condition there was a substantial likelihood that she would be prevented from bringing her case to trial if it were not specially set. (Code Civ. Proc., § 36.) Plaintiff was 75 years old at the time of the motion to specially set.

The motion was granted, and pursuant to section 36, subdivision (e), the case was set for trial within 120 days. Following expiration of the 120-day period, plaintiff sought and was granted one 15-day continuance.

On September 15, 1983, plaintiff moved that the matter be taken off calendar due to her physical infirmity. In support of her motion, plaintiff filed the declaration of Dr. Charles J. Burstin, who stated that he had treated plaintiff and that in his opinion she was physically and mentally incapable of participating in a trial at that time or in the future. Defendant objected to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.