Wynne

Wynne v. Orcutt Union School District

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 3d 1108·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1557·95 Cal. Rptr. 458
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 1971Civ. 37465California867 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fleming, J.

Plaintiffs Edward and Betty Wynne appeal a judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant Orcutt Union School District dismissing their complaint because of its failure to state a cause of action. (Maxon v. Security Ins. Co., 214 Cal.App.2d 603, 610 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 586 ].) The complaint pleaded the following facts:

Edward and Betty Wynne have a son, Martin, bom 13 June 1958. Martin is a victim of Friedreich’s ataxia, a progressively disabling disease of the central nervous system. Martin was admitted to the May Grisham School in the Orcutt Union School District for the 1968-1969 school year. “In strict confidence” Betty Wynne informed Martin’s teacher and his principal that her son was suffering from Friedreich’s ataxia and that he did not know its progressively disabling effects or its ultimate fatal outcome. On 21 January 1969 the teacher disclosed to Martin’s classmates that his disease was progressive and that Martin would soon die. Martin’s classmates immediately told Martin he had a fatal disease, and they repeatedly asked him when he would die. In turn Martin repeatedly asked his parents if he had a fatal disease and if he would die within a few years. They…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.