Hand

Hand v. Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine

Good Law
136 Cal. Rptr. 187·1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1158·66 Cal. App. 3d 605
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 1977Civ. 38753California5,573 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bray, J.

Defendant, appellant and respondent Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine (hereinafter Board) appeals from the judgment of the San Mateo County Superior Court granting the petition for writ of mandate of plaintiff, respondent and appellant Dr. William M. Hand (hereinafter Dr. Hand). Dr. Hand cross-appeals from the portion of the judgment ordering the Board to reconsider its action in light of the trial court’s findings.

Issues Presented

A) Appeal of Board.

B) Cross-appeal of Dr. Hand.

Record

On July 15, 1974, the Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine for the State of California filed an accusation against William Milton Hand and Sheila Palmer Shannon (hereinafter Dr. Shannon). Disciplinary action was sought against these two licensed veterinarians because of the treatment or lack of treatment rendered to a black male terrier named Noah while the dog was at the Peninsula Humane Society. The grounds for the proposed disciplinary action were that the conduct of the two veterinarians reflected unfavorably on the profession of veterinary medicine and constituted incompetence in the practice of veterinary medicine. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 4882, subds. (k) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.