In Re Marriage of Keeva

Appellant Joseph W. Keeva (hereinafter husband) appeals from an order of the superior court dated December 10, 1975, continuing spousal support awarded petitioner Toby Keeva (hereinafter wife).

An interlocutoiy judgment of dissolution was filed November 14, 1974, which contained provisions for spousal and child support as follows:

On November 20, 1974, husband filed his application for modification of both child support and spousal support, requesting that child support be set at “a reasonable sum,” and that spousal support be terminated, based upon allegations that at the time of the “intended decision for the Interlocutory Judgment,” husband “was employed . . . and his gross salaiy was $3,000 a month and his net monthly salary varied between $2,099.50 and $2,204.00,” but that on October 30, 1974, husband “was terminated by his employer . . . and presently has no income what soever.” The order to show cause on husband’s petition was heard January 17, 1975, at which time the court made its order as follows:

Before the expijation of the period for which diminished support was provided, and on May 16, 1975, husband filed his further application for modification. Again,…