Spindle

Spindle v. Travelers Insurance Companies

Good Law
136 Cal. Rptr. 404·1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1190·66 Cal. App. 3d 951
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 1977Civ. 48759California2,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jefferson, J.

Plaintiff David K. Spindle, M.D., filed a first amended complaint for. money damages (bad faith) against defendants Travelers Insurance Companies, a corporation, and the Phoenix Insurance Company, a corporation. Defendants demurred to this complaint upon the ground that plaintiff had failed to state a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained by the trial court, without leave to amend, and a judgment of dismissal was accordingly entered. Plaintiff has appealed.

The appellate standard of review to be applied in the case of an appeal from a judgment granted after a demurrer has been sustained without leave to amend is well-established: “In our examination of the complaint we are guided by the well settled principles governing the testing of its sufficiency by demurrer: A demurrer admits all material and issuable facts properly pleaded. [Citations.] However, it does not admit contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law alleged therein. [Citations.]” (Daar v. Yellow Cab Co. (1967) 67 Cal.2d 695, 713 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 433 P.2d 732 ].)

It appears from plaintiff’s amended complaint that he is a physician and surgeon duly licensed to practice medicine in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.