Cooks

Cooks v. Superior Court

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1118·224 Cal. App. 3d 723·274 Cal. Rptr. 113
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 1990B050565California1,338 words

Opinion

Opinion

By petition for writ of mandate, a defendant in a personal injury action challenges the trial court’s order denying a jury trial due to defense counsel’s failure to submit proposed jury instructions within the deadline set by the local “fast-track” rules of court. Petitioner asserts, and respondent and real parties do not deny, that this order was imposed as a sanction because of the failure of petitioner’s counsel to submit jury instructions within the time specified by these rules.

This court stayed trial and issued notice to the parties that it was considering the issuance of a peremptory writ in the first instance directing respondent, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 575.2, subdivision (b), to reinstate defendant’s jury trial rights and limit imposition of sanctions to defense counsel.

After considering the plenary opposition filed by real party in interest plaintiff", and the reply filed by petitioner, we conclude that respondent clearly abused its discretion and exceeded its jurisdiction under section 575.2, subdivision (b). We grant the peremptory writ.

The underlying personal injury action is a “fast-track” case subject to the Los Angeles Superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.