Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Sandyland Protective Ass'n

Good Law
224 Cal. App. 3d 1494·274 Cal. Rptr. 626
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 1990B042000California1,165 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

A homeowners association and a railroad company enter into an agreement whereby the association will construct and maintain a roadway so that its members can have access to their property across the railroad’s tracks. The agreement contains a clause which requires the association to indemnify the railroad for any negligence of the railroad.

Here we hold that the indemnification clause is unenforceable because Civil Code section 2782, subdivision (a) makes indemnification clauses void for the sole negligence of the promisee in a construction contract. We therefore affirm the judgment in favor of the association.

Facts

Sandyland Protective Association entered into an agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company to allow its members to cross the Southern Pacific railroad tracks. The agreement was signed by the president of the association in 1976. It was a successor to two similar agreements executed in 1956 and 1959 respectively.

The agreement provided that the association would construct and maintain the roadway and such signs as the railroad may designate; install and maintain gates or barricades as the railroad may require; and pay for all labor and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.