Aalgaard

Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1072·224 Cal. App. 3d 674·274 Cal. Rptr. 81·1990 WL 151790·5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1443
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 10, 1990C005605California8,900 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sparks, J.

The central question in this appeal is whether an action against a national banking association with less than 20 employees, and its officers, for age discrimination under the California statute (Gov. Code, § 12941) and for violation of employment covenants under California law is preempted by section 24, Fifth, of the National Bank Act. ( 12 U.S.C. § 24 , Fifth [Section 24 (Fifth)].) We hold that it is.

Under the act, “[a national banking] association . . . shall have power . . . [¶] To elect or appoint directors, and by its board of directors to appoint a president, vice president, cashier, and other officers, define their duties, . . . dismiss such officers or any of them at pleasure, and appoint others to fill their places.” (§ 24 (Fifth).) Under the California statute, however, an employer may not “discharge [or] dismiss . . . any individual over the age of 40 on the ground of age, except in cases where the law compels or provides for such action.” (Gov. Code, § 12941, subd. (a).) In addition, under California decisional law, an employer’s breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing gives rise to a cause of action for breach of contract. (Newman v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.