In Re Boag

Good Law
111 Cal. Rptr. 226·1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 761·35 Cal. App. 3d 866
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 7, 1973Crim. 6924California1,279 words

Opinion

Opinion

Friedman, J.

Petitioner, an inmate of Folsom Prison, seeks a writ of habeas corpus to require removal from his prison records of an entry on a form designated CDC 128-A. The entry is dated December 12, 1972, and reads as follows: “On this date the Subject was implicated in an unauthorized meeting in the Folsom Library. He was advised not to participate in any more unauthorized group meetings. Subject was given a copy of this document in person.”

After receiving a copy of the entry, petitioner filed with the warden a request for its removal. The warden responded as follows: “I have reviewed all reports connected with this incident and I am of the opinion that the evidence is irrefutable that an [un] authorized meeting was being held in the library in which you were a participant. The 128A simply documents this fact and does not represent a disciplinary charge, as such.

“I am therefore taking action to deny your request.”

Petitioner contends that the inclusion of the form 128-A in his file was a disciplinary action by the prison authorities which unfavorably affects his custody conditions and damages his chance for parole; that this “discipline” was imposed without providing him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.