Stearns

People v. Stearns

Good Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 711·1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 712·35 Cal. App. 3d 304
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 1973Crim. 22986California251 words

Opinion

Opinion

Files, J.

On this appeal defendant seeks to attack the fairness of a lineup in which he was identified by a witness as the perpetrator of a homicide.

Defendant was arrested, placed in a lineup, and identified by a witness. He was charged by information with murder (Pen. Code, § 187) and found guilty by a jury of first degree murder. His conviction was reversed on appeal because of errors of law in instructing the jury (People v. Stearns (1971) 14 Cal.App.3d 178 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 69 ]), and the cause was restored to the superior court calendar.

Subsequently defendant made what counsel called a “Wade-Gilbert motion” to suppress certain identification testimony upon the ground that the lineup had been unfair. Testimony was received, going to the lineup issue. This motion was denied on May 31, 1972. A jury trial commenced but a mistrial was declared when the jury became deadlocked. Then, pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. 1), proceedings were suspended, and defendant was placed on probation for three years.

Defendant now appeals “from a plea of guilty and the subsequent sentence” on the ground that his “pretrial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.