Anaya

Anaya v. Turk

Good Law
151 Cal. App. 3d 1092·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1629·199 Cal. Rptr. 187
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1984Civ. 67762California4,377 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feinerman, J.

Plaintiff, Roberto Anaya, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Charles and Patricia Turk, as individuals, and doing business as Turk’s Import and Export. In his first amended complaint, plaintiff sought damages for severe personal injuries suffered when, as a social guest in defendants’ apartment, he was shot by another defendant, Stanley Wilson (Wilson). As a result of his injuries, plaintiff is now a paraplegic.

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint contained two causes of action pertaining to defendants. In the first cause of action, plaintiff alleged that defendants were lessees of the premises at 10225 Regent Street, Apartment 4, in the City of Los Angeles. Plaintiff alleged that defendants were negligent in maintaining, supervising and controlling said premises in that they allowed Wilson on the premises when they knew that he possessed vicious and dangerous propensities—in that he was inclined to attack, rob, injure and murder persons in his vicinity. Plaintiff claimed that defendants also negligently failed to warn him of Wilson’s known dangerous propensities. Plaintiff further alleged that on August 27, 1979, while plaintiff was a guest at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.