Botos

Botos v. Los Angeles County Bar Assn.

Good Law
151 Cal. App. 3d 1083·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1628·199 Cal. Rptr. 236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1984Civ. 69703California2,581 words

Opinion

Opinion

Arabian, J.

Introduction

In a case of first impression we are called upon to determine whether an action for defamation may be maintained against a local bar association by an unsuccessful candidate for elective judicial office, following the association’s publication of an evaluation which concluded the candidate was “not qualified” to perform the duties of the office sought.

We conclude the action may not be maintained.

Statement of Facts

The complaint, which was couched in a single cause of action for defamation, was filed by appellant, Bela Botos (Botos) against respondent, the Los Angeles County Bar Association (LACBA) and several of its officers and members. Botos is seeking special, compensatory and exemplary damages. He alleges the following facts in his complaint and the several exhibits incorporated therein by reference:

Botos is a practicing attorney and has been a member of the California Bar for the past 18 years, enjoying a good name and reputation, both personally and professionally.

On February 10, 1982, he declared himself a candidate for the office of Judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, office no. 2.

After his official registration, on or about…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.